Well of Moses

Leading into the Renaissance, the human figure became the central focus in art. The new appreciation for individuality and naturalism was prominent, however represented differently in both Northern and Southern Europe. The uniqueness of Northern European artists for expressing personality through art can be seen through Claus Sluter’s “Well of Moses.”

 Image

Claus Sluter, apprenticed to Flemish sculptor Jean de Marville, was exposed to the Gothic styles of the Renaissance, where the human figure was still not portrayed as natural as possible. In his sculpture, the “Well of Moses,” Sluter leaves the Gothic portrayal of the human figure (tall figures, clothing draped vertically from head to toe, and faces that still did not represent individual detail), for distinguishable figures. There are six figures, Moses, David, Jeremiah, Zachariah, Daniel and Isaiah, who form a base to support a scene of Christ on the cross, surrounded by the Virgin Mary, Mary Magdalen and John the Evangelist. The detail of the six figures clearly leaves the style of his predecessors, with these figures each having different, detailed faces and clothing. In the north, artists focused on the human personality, and Sluter sets out to give each of his figures their own image. This style can be seen through examining the figures of Moses and David. When looking at Moses, the pain resonates from the wrinkles covering his face and surrounding his eyes, while the folds and detail in the cloak and robes that drape over David illustrate his wealth. From the stories we are told, Moses led his people through struggles, while David was a medieval king, but even without this knowledge, the detail still expresses the personalities and characteristics of the figures. This is a strong example of the focus of North Europeans on using naturalism to represent the human being.

2 responses to “Well of Moses

  1. This is really beautiful! The thing I like the most about it is the emotional expressions in the figures, and I think you did a nice job of explaining how that’s especially meaningful for these figures specifically.

  2. As you said, this is an interesting median between Gothic and Renaissance sculpture. These figures, despite breaking from the Gothic tradition of stale posture and languid form, still lack the depth of both emotion and physical verisimilitude that Renaissance sculpture entails. The figure on the right in the photo below, for example, does have a more natural, uneven weight distribution than we typically see in Gothic sculpture, but still isn’t necessarily in a “natural” pose (his torso is turned a different way than the direction his feet are pointing, there is little counterbalancing of weight, etc.).

    https://www.google.com/search?q=well+of+moses+claus+sluter&safe=off&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=Cfc6UqeFLbH_yQGJnYHIBA&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1150&bih=570&dpr=1#facrc=_&imgdii=394FMvnYLJsOrM%3A%3B-sxEYo7Q-53K4M%3B394FMvnYLJsOrM%3A&imgrc=394FMvnYLJsOrM%3A%3BpBn0lHxpiBCl9M%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fdijoon.free.fr%252Fpuits-moise.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fdijoon.free.fr%252Fbestof%252Fclausluter.htm%3B291%3B442

    Still a really impressive piece of art, though, especially considering that it was created about 100 years before the High Renaissance.

Leave a comment